Could AI really end humanity? Our tech experts are answering your questions now
https://www.theguardian.com/community/live/2026/sep/18/could-ai-really-end-humanity-technology-qandaAfter a week of alarming warnings about artificial intelligence’s potential to destroy the world as we know it, our technology reporters are answering your questions on the reality of the AI threat live now
LadyCassandra asks: My worry is about bias built-in into AI models which can become discriminatory. We already witness serious issues with deep fakes, surveillance of ordinary citizens, facial recognition etc. Are we heading for AI-enabled dystopia, with civil liberties being eroded until as citizens we become utterly powerless in the face of tech and its AI with no government or institution strong enough to defend against it?
Blake: An AI-enabled dystopia is never inevitable. There is always hope to reverse that outcome.
Aisha: For what it’s worth, it seems unlikely that AI at this point can significantly change the equation around bioweapons or viruses. An individual who worked for many years on bioweapons at the State Department told us, basically, that what has prevented bioweapon attacks through the past decades is not the difficulty of inventing new deadly viruses, but other, more prosaic issues. Consider the failure of Aum Shinrikyo to kill vast numbers of people with botulism and anthrax by spraying these around central Tokyo. There are a lot of logistical challenges, and chemical weapons seem more straightforward. Those exist without AI needing to invent new ones.
Nuclear war - humans might make the poor decision to put AI in charge of key nuclear systems, perhaps, but that seems more of a human error than a rogue AI error. Humans could also make the poor decision to launch tactical warheads without AI.
How might AI kill us otherwise? There are of course plenty of plausible scenarios. If you’re a civilian in Gaza or Iran, it could direct a US or Israeli missile your way. But perhaps our focus might be more productively directed towards the people and companies in charge of the systems, as opposed to Dr Strangelove scenarios.