I wonder how many people are working on clones of existing software with an eye toward making a much more evolvable and customizable version with AI at the core of the model.

You can make the same software easily, with Claude's help, and if you think about the things users want to customize, you can give them a toolkit for doing exactly what they want in prompts, as opposed to code, plugins, etc.

So you don't vibe-code it, you start with an app that's designed to be beautiful on the inside, easy to understand for a new maestro of software, but something they can evolve with prompts so they can be working on something else intently.

We provide beautiful code for aspiring symphonists to learn from.

I remember when I first got my hands on the Unix source back in 1978. I was blown away by what was possible. I had largely been a Fortran programmer up till then. The pieces don't fit together so well on their own, I learned, you have to move them into place and for that a lot of trying-things-out has to happen.

Why am I thinking about this? I have friends who are not programmers who are pretty close to where I was then, waiting to see how real software is made. And they can have that experience soon. I love where we are now in tech.

BTW, on its own Claude writes some really shitty code. ;-)

I gave the new ChatGPT image maker a whirl, it's supposed to be more thoughtful and realistic.

The prompt: “A turkey in plastic with supermarket label with text and fine print. The branding is Really Simple brand Turkey. The motto, ‘turkey for simple people.‘“

A really simple brand turkey from ChatGPT.

I'm creating new software in ways I never would have conceived of last year. I see solutions to one of the most significant code management problems we used to have, our inability to remember how our code works, unless the app is very small and they never seem to be. This is why you don't see much inspiration in app updates after a couple of years. Everyone has moved on and no one who remains can figure out how it works. But that has changed now, bigtime.

The next product I develop should be able to continue to evolve much more easily thanks to Claude Code.

"Hey Claude, people want this feature to be optional (or configurable). Here's how that should work."

In a human-based development organization, even if you ran the show, you might wait a very long time and it might never come. With Claude, I can have the new functionality before I know what to do with it.

I called my second company UserLand. The idea was that we'd develop software for users, always be thinking of them, and listening and give them more and more power to shape the way their computers worked. It was what I felt was missing from software in the 80s, a focus on the users creating their own future. So back then we designed the software for them. We were hoping they'd get to implement it too.

Now we're going to try again. 😄

A few months ago, some guys from Netscape came out with a way to get AI to pay called Really Simple Licensing or RSL.

I was really put off by the way they took the name that everyone knows came from me with no help from anyone. Maybe I could have done something about it, instead I found a way to have some fun.

With Really Simple versions of granola, spaghetti, ketchup, cola, ravioli, baby shampoo and books. And it's time for another one!

Introducing the all-new Really Simple Coffee Mug!

BTW, I don't think RSL was a good name. Simplicity is not its main selling point, it's money! It's about making you rich. If I'm not mistaken.

But syndication, in 2002 -- was getting much more complicated than it needed to be. So "Really Simple Syndication" was supposed to be a little funny because it was not like the acronyms that tech usually comes up with.

It didn't pretend to be anything but a syndication format. Complexity is the enemy of good software. You have to work at making something no more than it is. It's a struggle. And you don't add complexity wihtout having a really good reason for doing it.

I've been designing and developing software like WordPress for over thirty years. I have stong opinions about where the product should have gone, but mostly I've not been talking about that, because I don't want to interfere with what Matt is doing.

I've known him since he was a teenager in Silicon Valley, a boy wonder to whom the web has always been there, whereas to people my age, it was a miracle that came along to put down all the dominant BigCo's who made it impossible for individuals to create.

But I've never believed in open source the way Matt does, as I explained last week. I think there needs to be competition in the writer's UI for WordPress, and in all other areas of the user interface. I think that's what it suffers from. There isn't enough diversity. Creativity is crowded into a very small space, plug-ins. Because there's an API that covers the full functionality of product, there's no technical reason it has to be this way. I believe in competition, because it encourages listening. People don't listen to their friends, I've discovered, but people do listen to their competitors.

The community is paralyzed, it can't fix basic problems that have been there forever. Gutenberg was a good idea for a site designer and a not-good approach for writers. But it should always be a choice for writers, if they like Gutenberg. There should be no single recommended editor for WordPress.

Imho, there are ways to navigate this landscape, but it's going to require immediate and radical restructuring.

WordPress is not the last hope of the web and the web is not going to disappear in our lifetimes. Everything is built on it. People who say it's about to disappear are alarmist purveyors of clickbait. You'll still be able to ship apps for the web five and ten years from now. But WordPress is an important part of the web, and I don't mean because it runs a certain percentage of all the sites, which is imho a meaningless stat. It's a uniquely valuable API and an implementation that's debugged and scales and is profitable, and can sustain a large organization supporting it. It's one of those things we could lose, but we'd be much poorer if that happened.

WordPress is unique in the products that came to us from Silicon Valley. It's universally useful and it doesn't lock you in.

If a product like EmDash were to be the successor it claims to be, well there goes all the open stuff, because I don't think they have it in their blood the way Matt and WordPress do.

My conclusion after being a software developer since the early days of Unix and personal computers, and at times being part of the Silicon Valley -- there have to be a variety of UIs for WordPress, where all our work is compatible, regardless of what our tools look like, the approaches for users could be radically different. It's been a monoculture, and imho that's the problem. Break it apart, yet retain the compatibility -- that's the most powerful position possible in tech.

PS: After writing this piece, I looked for early references to Matt on my blog, and came across this piece he wrote in 2006. He totally understood what was going on in RSS land. Here's another Matt post from 2010, which after reading I concluded that he saw WordPress as I saw it and still do, as the rightful heir to the legacy of Twitter. And Matt and team did develop the API he talks about in 2010 as hypothetical, it's there now, ready to lead us out of the darkness.

The logic of Cory Doctorow's enshittification model applies to government too.

Both political parties view the electorate as sources of money or people who are manipulated by ads and PR bought with the money.

The wants and needs of people, in both government and social media, have nothing to do with anything.

In both cases they work for the benefit of the funders, only.

It's just a business. And users and voters realize that, but they feel powerless to do anything about it.

Voters attach to any company or person who sounds like they get it and agree and want to fix it. In politics as in tech there are people who actually do want to fix it. We thought that the web would do that for politics, but the users gravitated to the enshittified spaces. And the developers all acted selfishly and wouldn't work with each other. Now the hope is that with AI tools, individual developers can maintain codebases as big and complicated as the ones maintained by the VC-backed companies. No one talks about this. We should.

I've now done two projects with Claude Code. I added a feature to the server running behind WordLand, and adapted wpEditorDemo to work have a second example, using Gutenberg as the editing user interface. Haven't released the Gutenberg app yet, that should happen today, Murphy-willing.

I had never written a Gutenberg app before, btw. Claude figured all that out. For most of the project I didn't look at the JavaScript app it created. When I finally did look I was delighted to see that it used the same coding style as I use, developed over many years. It's like programming in overdrive.

I had to do the testing for Claude in the second case because it can't test apps that run in the browser. So it was giving me checklists of things to do and I'd report back on what happened. Still, a lot faster and easier than doing it on my own. It's a very good, tireless and super well-informed programming partner.

Not sure what my third project will be, probably going to stick with something small. The big move will be working with FeedLand in this mode. There are a bunch of changes that should make it run faster. Also might be possible to make it easier to install for people who are using AI tools. And since most of the action takes place on the server, I think I can get Claude to do better testing than I, a human can do, one who gets tired pretty darned quickly. That's when things get really interesting, not that the whole thing isn't really interesting, most interesting dev work I've done since the early days of the web.

The perfect app for an AI to do for you is a demo app. Yesterday I wrote about making WordPress boom with new apps for writers that run in the web ecosystem, not as plug-ins, in JS running in the browser, or on the desktop, any desktop, that would work too. Probably would be fine to put an MCP shell around it so it can be in AI-internal scripts.

I'm into writing tools. Proud of it. I'm a writer and a developer. Did I become a developer to create tools for writers or the other way around? At this point the answer to both questions is yes.

I'm basically offering to host a potluck party where people bring an app that works alongside WordLand but works differently from WordLand. Mine is a simple wizzy editor with a Markdown flip-switch. But everyone likes a different kind of editor. There is no single best editor for the web and since WordPress is of the web that applies here too.

If this work is ragingly successful it should have the adoption of XML-RPC in 1998, where devs were competing to get support for their favorite platform before all the others. Here's the list as of 2003. It was exciting and fun, kind of like how things are now.

So back to the AI connection. I started a session with Claude this morning and asked it to look at wpEditorDemo. Let's write a developer's guide and an AI guide, I said to my AI friend. This was a direction Don Park, a very longtime human friend suggested.

Claude and I spent the remaining time this morning creating a Gutenberg editor that works alongside WordLand. The two apps share files through the wpIdentity server that connects to WordPress.

So you can edit the text with either or both editors. If you use both you'll have to stick to Markdown. But you could use the Gutenberg editor for documents or sites where Gutenberg is better or required. This is so key. The document is yours to do with as you please. It's the web way for text to work. No lock-in. So important because almost everywhere else on what remains of the web, the ability to write and publish comes with a cost: lock-in. That's why writing on the web sucks so much.

I know Matt thinks open source is everything and that always bothered me a little.

• I loved that the NYT came on board with RSS 2.0 in 2002 that made it grow like a weed in all the right places, but it wasn't open source, though they didn't hide the source. They made an incredible contribution to the web which is largely unsung.
• Same with NPR and podcasting. It never would have booted up as fast or well and stayed open on the web without the help of WGBH and Tony Kahn. Again, not open source.

What you do need are partners who let people bring their text any way they want and don't make people type it into their defective editors, which deliberately constrain you -- to their shitty little silo.

To my WordPress friends -- WordLand is not seeking to replace Gutenberg, it just wants a place alongside it. And to open the doors for a myriad different approaches to writing on the web, all working beautifully with WordPress.

This should blow open the doors of the writer's ecosystem of the web, adding a whole new level, like adding air travel alongside trains and cars. And it should show how inadequate the current best writing environments are.

We'll have the Gutenberg editor for you to try out along with developer docs later today or tomorrow, Murphy-willing.

All made possible by WordPress and Claude.ai. What a time we live in! All of a sudden the web works again even if people have lost hope, because the AIs do the work either way. ;-)

Update: Here's a screen shot of the Gutenberg demo app.

New ways to write with WordPress as the back-end.

Build an API that combines what wpcom does and storage.

Recruit devs to create products for this environment.

• Gutenberg will be one of these editors.
• I will provide WordLand which is a wizzy html editor that has a flip-switch Markdown mode.
• MarsEdit can join the club if possible.
• Leaflet would be great too.
• Any app that requires text editing is a good idea.

Here's the really cool thing -- we can all edit each others' docs.

Put another way, the docs belong to the users, and they let access them.

The storage is so we can build smarter better editors, more fun, color, interactions, cool toys for writers.

And yes, btw -- they are on the web, and there's an RSS 2.0 feed with rssCloud support.

And for that we can create all kinds of amazing readers, I want to do one with SVG now that I know how to do that thanks to ChatGPT of course. SVG is another breakthrough waiting to happen.

We're right there now. Ready to go. We start with text editors and build from there.

There's a new place to put WordPress, under our apps. It's remarkably good for that.

I don't know about you but I thought there was a pretty good chance Trump would detonate a nuke somewhere yesterday, and the fact that we did not get him out of there in time to prevent it, says we went along with it. You can decide what that means.

I've had several friends over the years who are German. My age or a little older. People who grew up with the shame of being German in the postwar years. Friends. People who weren't born when the atrocities happened. We were friends and when I could I tried to assure them that I know they weren't there when it happened. It didn't matter, as far as they were concerned it didn't absolve them of the shame. It had become their birthright.

American friends, what we allowed to happen yesterday, even though we were adequately warned, says we went along with it. If we wanted to stop it now, I believe we could, and we still can.

PS: Good German is an ironic term. Wikipedia's explainer nails it.

The president of the United States is spinning around acting like a NYC real estate jumbo who accidentally was elected president and after only five years in office has realized a whole new level of trolling. It started with cable news, then went to Twitter, then masked American gestapo killing protestors on TV for everyone to see, and then starting a war with Iran of all countries.

I'm sure his generals suggested that at the same time as they were bombing Iran proper, that they should send in a few boatloads of Marines to occupy the Strait of Hormuz. When the Iranians weren't so desperate, it might have been relatively easy to take it over. I'm sure we've spent billions over the years on what to do if we had to attack Iran, not like now when things like this are done on a whim.

Anyway, what a movie. The audacity of the writers. One things for sure we'll all be watching at 8PM Eastern to see if he blows up the world tonight or whatever.

The voice of America channel on Bluesky.

I recommend this post on vibe coding.

There's a lot more to development than coding.

I've tried vibe coding myself, and while it's sometimes relaxing and fun, it's pretty hard to get the output to match what you had in mind.

I think people find it amazing that they can create code, not just that the machine can create it. I know what that's like because I get a rush from creating images, something I never had a skill for, so all of a sudden being able to express myself with drawings was a breakthrough for me. ;-)

I've spent a few decades making commercial quality software in a variety of contexts, and so far I wouldn't rush to get rid of my dev teams based on the idea that the bots can do their work.

I think more realistically we have powerful new tools that we as yet have not learned how to use, but it's pretty exciting to see what may be possible.

I love all the new discourse about WordPress.

It was so quiet until this week, now I'm getting a much better view of the landscape.

I started developing seriously around WordPress almost three years ago. I've been developing this kind of software since the late 80s if you can believe that.

What's missing on the web -- software for writers.

I believe more all the time that WordPress is the natural way to store and present writing on the web and hook up to all the social webs, to actually redefine what a social web is. There should just be one social web, btw -- not 18. If there are 18 and they don't interop, then none of them deserve to call themselves the web. There is only one web, by definition.

The WordPress community has been very introspective, but it's time to make a difference for the whole web, and imho it is prepared to do that.

I want something inbetween the tiny little text boxes of the twitter-like apps, and the block editor (aka Gutenberg) of WordPress. I think there should be a dozen great editors that work with WordPress and then hopefully every CMS that comes along. Collectively, WordPress has taken too much territory -- writing is very different from site development and administration. I want to start the development of that ecosystem, and help new products get to market with interop and driven by what users/writers want.

I wrote this at bullmancuso yesterday, it was worth repeating here. And if you used to follow me on Twitter, please sign up again from that link. It's my new home there.

Excellent podcast discussion with John Stewart and Heather Cox Richardson. I desperately wanted to get in the conversation. I think they missed something important and came soooo close. Trump isn't only a TV star, he's a blogger. Comes naturally to him. Why wasn't Obama transformative in the same way? First black president. You get to be the first black president by being utterly brilliant and infinitely careful. There wasn't a single spontaneous moment in his presidency, though there were scripted moments when playing that role. And some amazingly brilliant speech-making. He's perfect, but that's because there were severe limits on what he could get away with.

On the web the ethos is "Come as you are, we're just folks." That's not Obama.

Who also had to be hugely careful? Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris. Not Joe Biden who's famous for his gaffes.

Trump doesn't give a shit what you think, that's why he's so good on Twitter. Trump was a TV star but right now it's more important to be a natural born blogger.

I was beating this drum ever since Trump appeared on Twitter. We need to be much better at this. We're still in the hole. At least Newsom knows there's a problem but imho he isn't the answer. We need someone who's bitter and funny, like Joan Rivers or Don Rickles. You don't need to understand government or politics, just show up and be a kind of lovable asshole 24 hours a day.

People could relate to Trump. Trump, even though he's not a great dancer, doesn't mind doing it if you think it's funny. He's a total entertainment package. Very random.

Wouldn't hurt for the next Dems to to find someone like that. Hopefully not to run for president.

HCR said Trump was Cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs -- I LOL'd totally.

Things are changing a lot. Huge flow of ideas, and some catching up to do. Mind bombs in every direction.

Last night while watching sports I learned via ChatGPT about MCP.

Here's what it can do and people *are* using it for this

You could turn ChatGPT into an easy editor for WordPress posts.

Just as I have developed the habit of getting it to create a handoff.md file when I'm done with a session, I could write something with ChatGPT helping, I don't ever do that myself but i might, if it were easy. and when I'm ready to publish, I'd say "Please publish this on my daveverse site now." I might specify a category or two, or set defaults, it's good at that stuff. I've taught Claude to write code in my style, so I can maintain it (to answer Aral Balkan's question on Mastodon).